不同居群狗牙根的叶片解剖结构比较研究

草业学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 149-158.

不同居群狗牙根的叶片解剖结构比较研究

李亚男,罗丽娟^*

海南大学园艺园林学院,海南儋州 571737

收稿日期:2009-07-22 出版日期:2010-08-20 发布日期:2010-08-20
作者简介:李亚男(1985-),女,云南保山人,在读硕士。E-mailliyanan55wangyi@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划“973”项目(2007CB108903)资助

A comparative study on the anatomical structure of leaves from different populations of bermudagrass

LI Ya-nan, LUO Li-juan

College of Horticulture, Hainan University, Danzhou 571737, China

Received:2009-07-22 Online:2010-08-20 Published:2010-08-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对20个不同生长环境的狗牙根叶片进行了比较解剖学的研究。结果表明,参试材料在角质层厚度、表皮细胞厚度、叶表皮细胞的长宽、气孔的大小及密度、叶片厚度、维管束个数及直径大小,机械组织厚度等方面有显著的差异。其中变异系数较大的是气孔密度及中脉维管束与上表皮间的机械组织厚度,气孔密度的变幅为77.49～335.46个/mm²,变异系数达36.93%,机械组织厚度的变幅为7.50～45.00μm,变异系数达64.20%。将测定的数量指标进行了聚类分析,20个不同居群的狗牙根可分为4大类。聚类结果与狗牙根的生境分布相互吻合。

Abstract: A study of the anatomical structure of leaves from 20 populations of bermudagras growing in different environments found that there were significant differences in cuticular thickness, epidermal cells thickness, leaf epidermal cell lengths and widths, stomata size and density, leaf thickness, number and diameter of vascular bundles, and strengthening tissue thickness. The coefficients of variability were greater in stomatal density and in strengthening tissue thickness than in vascular bundles of midribs and the abaxial epidermis. Stomatal density ranged from 77.49 to 335.46 per mm², with a coefficient of variability up to 36.93%. Strengthening tissue thickness ranged from 7.50 to 45.00 μm, with a coefficient of variability up to 64.20%. Using the indexes measured, the 20 populations of bermudagrass could be divided into four categories by cluster analysis. The results of cluster analysis were identical with the population distributions of the bermudagrass.

中图分类号:

李亚男,罗丽娟. 不同居群狗牙根的叶片解剖结构比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(4): 149-158.

LI Ya-nan, LUO Li-juan. A comparative study on the anatomical structure of leaves from different populations of bermudagrass[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(4): 149-158.

参考文献

[1] Gatschet M J, Taliaferro C M. Cold acclimation and alterations in protein synthesis in bermudagrass-crowns[J]. American Society for Horticultural Science, 1994, 119(3): 477-480.
[2] 陈志一. 草坪栽培与管理(第一版)[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1993: 73-95.
[3] Harlan J R, De Wet J M. Sources of viration in Cynodon dactylon(L.)Pers.[J]. Crop Science, 1969, 36: 744-748.
[4] 王栋. 牧草学各论[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1989: 69-72.
[5] 孙吉雄. 草坪学[M]. 兰州: 甘肃科技出版社, 1989: 64-70.
[6] 周寿荣. 草坪地被与人类环境[M]. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社, 1996: 74-88.
[7] Taliaferro C M. Diversity and vulnerability of bermuda turfgrass species[J]. Crop Science Society of America, 1995, 35: 327-332.
[8] 王志勇, 刘建秀, 郭海林. 狗牙根种质资源营养生长特性差异的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 25-32.
[9] 张小艾, 张新全, 杨春华, 等. 狗牙根种质资源遗传多样性的研究概况[J]. 草原与草坪, 2003, (3): 17-21.
[10] Wylie R B. Principles of foliar organization shown by sun-shade leaves from ten species of deciduous dicotyledonous trees[J]. American Journal of Botany, 1951, 38: 335-361.
[11] Jackson L W R. Effect of shade on leaf structure of deciduous trees species[J]. Ecology, 1967, 48: 498-499.
[12] Bongers F, Popma J. Leaf characteristics of the tropical rain forest flora of Los Tuxtlas[J]. Mexico Botanical Gazette, 1990, 151: 354-365.
[13] 贺金生, 陈伟烈, 王力陵. 高山栎叶的形态结构及其与生态环境的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 1994, 18(3): 219-227.
[14] Liu J Q, Qiu M X. Ecophysiological and anatomical study on Ammopiptanthus mongolicus[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 1982, 24: 568-574.
[15] Yuan Y M, Peng Z X. The systematic and ecological significance of anatomical characters of leaves in the tribe Thermopsideae (Fabacene)[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 1991, 33: 840-847.
[16] 沈宗根, 李景原. 9种芦荟属植物叶的结构和芦荟素含量的比较研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2001, 21(2): 278-286.
[17] 刘全宏, 王孝安, 田先华, 等. 太白红杉叶的形态解剖学特征与环境因子的关系[J]. 西北植物学报, 2001, 21(5): 885-893.
[18] 陆静梅, 李建东. 同种不同生态环境植物解剖结构比较研究[J]. 东北师范大学学报, 1994, (3): 100-103.
[19] 丁雨龙, 赵奇僧, 陈志银, 等. 竹叶结构的比较解剖及其对系统分类意义的评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1994, 18(3): 1-5.
[20] Brawn W V. Leaf anatomy in grass systematica[J]. Botanical Gazette, 1958, 3: 170-178.
[21] 郑国昌. 生物显微技术[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 1979.
[22] 李正理. 植物制片技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978.
[23] 耿世磊, 赵晟, 吴鸿. 三种草坪草的茎、叶解剖结构及其坪用性状[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2002, 10(2): 145-151.
[24] 李志东, 黎可华, 何会蓉, 等. 华南地区7个暖季型草坪草种的抗旱性与灌溉节水的初步研究[J]. 草业科学, 2008, 25(11): 120-124.
[25] 白史且, 苟文龙, 张新全, 等. 不同居群假俭草叶片比较解剖学的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2003, 25(2): 36-41.
[26] 中国科学院植物研究所. 草类纤维(禾本科)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1982: 10.
[27] 李扬汉. 禾本科植物的形态与解剖[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1979: 66-68.
[28] Carpenter S B, Smith N B. Stomata distribution and size in southern appalachian hardwoods[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1975, (52): 153-156.
[29] 邢毅, 赵祥, 董宽虎, 等. 不同居群达乌里胡枝子形态变异研究[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(4): 26-31.
[30] 曾广文, 蒋德安. 植物生理学[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2003: 23.
[31] 曲涛, 南志标. 作物和牧草对干旱胁迫的响应及机理研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(2): 126-135.